翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Barr House ・ Barr Lake State Park ・ Barr McClellan ・ Barr Pharmaceuticals ・ Barr River, Morvern ・ Barr Settlement, Nova Scotia ・ Barr Smith ・ Barr Smith Library ・ Barr Subdivision ・ Barr Township ・ Barr Township, Cambria County, Pennsylvania ・ Barr Township, Daviess County, Indiana ・ Barr Township, Macoupin County, Illinois ・ Barr Trail ・ Barr Tribunal ・ Barr v. City of Columbia ・ Barr Water ・ Barr'd Harbour ・ Barr's Hill School ・ Barr's Subdivision Historic District ・ Barr, Ayrshire ・ Barr, Bas-Rhin ・ Barr, Illinois ・ Barr, Macoupin County, Illinois ・ Barr, Sangamon County, Illinois ・ Barr-Reeve Junior-Senior High School ・ Barra ・ Barra (disambiguation) ・ Barra (Naples) ・ Barra (neighborhood) Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Barr v. City of Columbia ： ウィキペディア英語版 Barr v. City of Columbia ''Barr v. City of Columbia'', 378 U.S. 146 (1964), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court reversed the convictions of five African Americans who were refused service at a lunch counter of a department store based upon a prior Court decision, holding that there was insufficient evidence to support a breach of peace conviction and that criminal trespass convictions would be reversed for the reasons stated in another case that was decided that same day, ''Bouie v. City of Columbia'', 378 U.S. 347 (1964). ''Bouie'' held that the retroactive application of expanded construction of a criminal statute was barred by due process of ex post facto laws. == Background == Five African American college students went to a department store in Columbia, South Carolina, and sat down at its lunch counter and waited for service. The department store allowed persons of all races to use all facilities except for the lunch counter, which served whites only. The store manager had arranged for police to be present for any sit-in demonstrators, and then, consistent with the restaurant's policy of refusing service to blacks, the restaurant manager requested the persons to leave. When they refused, they were arrested for breach of the peace and criminal trespass. At trial the defendants their arrest, prosecution, and conviction by the state for requesting service at a restaurant that refused service to African Americans would violate the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The trial court convicted the students, and the Supreme Court of South Carolina affirmed in an unreported decision. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Barr v. City of Columbia」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.